Jump to content

Tina Resch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tina Resch (also goes by her full name Christina Elaine Boyer,[1] born October 23, 1969) was a central figure in a series of incidents that came to be called the Columbus poltergeist case. In 1984, alleged telekinesis events at her Columbus, Ohio home drew significant news media interest. A series of color photographs taken by photojournalist Fred Shannon, and published by The Columbus Dispatch, were purported to show Resch sitting in an armchair with a telephone handset and phone cord flying in front of her. Resch's story, and Shannon's photography, were featured on a 1993 episode of Unsolved Mysteries.[2]

Skeptics and debunkers pointed out that much of the proclaimed evidence was anecdotal and thin and declared the case to be a hoax.[3][4][5] Paul Kurtz wrote that Resch was "a disturbed teenager" who faked poltergeist phenomena because she "craved attention".[6]

Resch was married and divorced twice, and had a child named Amber Boyer. In 1994, facing a potential death penalty if she agreed to go to trial before jury, Resch instead accepted a plea bargain with prosecutors to being responsible for the death of her three-year-old daughter that had occurred while the daughter was being looked after by her boyfriend, and she was sentenced to life imprisonment.[7]

Alleged poltergeist case

[edit]

Tina Resch is the adopted daughter of Joan and John Resch, who were physically abusive to her.[8][9] The Resches were well known in Columbus, as they were foster parents who had helped care for 250 children prior to 1984.[10] When she was 14, Tina watched the movie Poltergeist, and shortly afterward the family reported seeing objects fly around their house.[11] Reporter Mike Harden of The Columbus Dispatch was asked to assist the family, and involved photographer Fred Shannon.[10] The Columbus Dispatch interviewed Tina, and later published several photos purporting to show a telephone flying through the air.[3]

Parapsychologist William Roll stayed in the Resch house to investigate the case, and claimed that there had been genuine "spontaneous psychokinesis".[12] Roll, however, never observed any object move by itself. In one incident, a picture fell from a wall in an upstairs room where Tina had been alone half an hour before; Roll was facing away from the picture when it fell.[9][12] James Randi, an investigator for the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal was refused access to the household,[13] but investigated the case and suspected Tina had faked the alleged poltergeist occurrences.[14] According to Terence Hines:

The Resch poltergeist turned out to be so elusive that no one ever actually saw a single object even start to move of its own accord. This included the newspaper photographer, who found that if he watched an object, it stubbornly refused to budge. So he would hold up his camera and look away... One of the photos obtained in this way was distributed by the Associated Press and touted widely as proof of the reality of the phenomenon. Examined closely, the photographic evidence in this case strongly suggested that Tina was faking the occurrences by simply throwing the phone and other "flying" objects when no one was looking. Randi's careful analysis of the other photos, many unpublished, of Tina and her flying phone strengthen the conclusion that she was faking. The editor of The Columbus Dispatch, Luke Feck, embarrassed by the revelation that he and his paper were taken in by so obvious a fake, refused Randi permission to print the photos he had given him earlier, in an apparent attempt to suppress the evidence of Tina's trickery and the newspaper's credulity."[3]

In a later incident, a visiting television crew inadvertently left a video camera on, which caught footage of Tina deliberately knocking over a table lamp, then screaming as if in fright, an event that had previously been ascribed to the poltergeist. When confronted with the videotape, Tina claimed she had done it to get the reporters to leave.[12][15] Randi characterized the situation as a hoax by an adolescent girl seeking attention, saying, "examination of available material indicates that fraudulent means or perfectly explainable methods have been employed to provide the media with sensational details about an otherwise trivial matter."[16] Randi examined a roll of photos taken by press photographers and said that they showed the girl's foot hooked beneath a sofa that had purportedly moved by itself, and that the glass in a picture frame that allegedly shattered on its own while in her hands was already broken before she ever picked it up.[17] His conclusion of the case, as he reported in Skeptical Inquirer, Spring 1985, was as follows:

The evidence for the validity of poltergeist claims in this case is anecdotal and thin, at best. The evidence against them is, in my estimation, strong and convincing.[14]

Conviction and imprisonment

[edit]

Tina Resch married and divorced twice, changing her name to Christina Boyer, and had a daughter named Amber.[7] In April 1992, at the age of three, Amber was found dead, suspected to have been beaten to death.[18][19] Boyer and David Herrin, her boyfriend of a few months, were arrested and tried for the murder of Amber.[7] Tina was not present at the time of the death of her daughter, who had been left in Herrin's care at the time. The medical examiner at Herrin's trial testified that the cause of Amber's death was "blunt force trauma she received to her head", inflicted shortly before her death,[7] and both Tina and Herrin blamed each other for the injuries.[20] Even as the Unsolved Mysteries segment about Tina premiered on May 19, 1993, Boyer was sitting in jail and awaiting trial.[21][22] At the time, the Unsolved Mysteries segment made no mention of the criminal charges against Tina.[22]

Tina was charged with aggravated battery, and in October 1994, rather than face trial and the possibility of a death sentence, Boyer agreed to a plea bargain negotiated by her attorney and District Attorney Peter Skandalakis.[7][23] She entered an Alford plea, in which she pleaded guilty while maintaining her innocence.[24] Tina received a life sentence plus 20 years, with the possibility of parole. David Herrin was convicted of cruelty to children, and sentenced to 20 years. He was released from Dooly State Prison on November 16, 2011.[23]

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution referred to Boyer as the "Telekinetic Mom" in some of its reporting on the legal issues in 1994.[24]

In 2004, William Roll collaborated with writer Valerie Storey on a book entitled Unleashed – Of Poltergeists and Murder: The Curious Story of Tina Resch. The book claims Tina possessed telekinetic powers and was innocent in the death of Amber.[25]

Boyer was originally incarcerated at Pulaski State Prison in Hawkinsville, Georgia, since 2008, and is currently housed at McRae Correctional Facility in McRae, Georgia.[7][23]

Photographer raises doubts about conviction

[edit]

Tina Resch refers to herself as Christina Boyer. After photographer Jan Banning obtained permission to take pictures of prisoners in the Pulaski State Prison,[26] Resch/Boyer was one of the prisoners portrayed by Banning.[27] Five years later, Banning took a sabbatical year; Looking back at his career, he started to investigate Christina Boyer's case, because Banning suspected that Resch/Boyer has not had a fair trial.[28] Banning's attempts to obtain parole for Resch/Boyer resulted in a podcast, published by Dutch public radio.[29] Banning wrote a book in which he explains how and why he became convinced that Resch/Boyer was likely not guilty[7] of killing her daughter Amber.[30] The Christina Boyer case has also been the subject of a film and a three part documentary.[31] Banning used his connections to form a team that is working on setting Resch/Boyer free, but as of June 2025, Resch/Boyer was still in prison.[32]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ About Christina Boyer Former students Sarah, Lizzie and Grace describe their research into Christina Boyer's wrongful conviction, as part of an assignment for law professor Marc Howard at Georgetown University
  2. ^ "Unsolved Mysteries: Episode #238". Retrieved March 27, 2009. Original U.S. airdate: May 19, 1993.
  3. ^ a b c Hines, Terrence, Pseudoscience and the Paranormal, Prometheus Books (2003). pp. 98–100. ISBN 978-1573929790
  4. ^ Gordon, Henry, Extrasensory Deception: ESP, Psychics, Shirley MacLaine, Ghosts, UFOs, Macmillan of Canada (1988). p. 107. ISBN 978-0771595394
  5. ^ Goode, Erich, Paranormal Beliefs: A Sociological Introduction. Waveland Pr Inc. (2000). p. 193. ISBN 978-1577660767
  6. ^ Kurtz, Paul, A Skeptic's Handbook of Parapsychology. Prometheus Books (1985). p. 220. ISBN 978-0879753009
  7. ^ a b c d e f g Susan Horn (January 20, 2008). Carroll Star News. Carrollton, Georgia, US: Georgia Rail and Press Company. The real story of Christina Resch Boyer: Did a 'perfect storm' of events lead to life imprisonment? A lengthy front-page story with color photo in which the publisher calls for a reexamination of the legal case by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles; News article first published 20th of January 2008, republished 17th of June 2018 [1] <= here; Archived version [2] <= here
  8. ^ Sady Doyle (13 August 2019). Dead Blondes and Bad Mothers. Melville House Publishing. p. 13. ISBN 9781612197920. OCLC 1104214645.
  9. ^ a b Couttie, Bob (1988). Forbidden Knowledge: The Paranormal Paradox. Lutterworth Press. pp. 60–61. ISBN 9780718826864. OCLC 17263288.
  10. ^ a b Dunning, Brian. "Skeptoid #448: The Columbus Poltergeist". Skeptoid.
  11. ^ Wynn, Charles M. and Arthur W. Wiggins, Quantum Leaps in the Wrong Direction: Where Real Science Ends...and Pseudoscience Begins, Joseph Henry Press (2001). p. 99. ISBN 978-0309073097
  12. ^ a b c Kendrick Frazier (27 January 2011). Science Confronts the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. pp. 152–. ISBN 978-1-61592-619-0.
  13. ^ Nickell, Joe, The Outer Edge: Classic Investigations of the Paranormal, Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (1996). p. 118. ISBN 978-1117887708
  14. ^ a b Randi, James, The Columbus Poltergeist Case: Part I. Skeptical Inquirer 9: 221–35. (1984–85). [3], [4]
  15. ^ Paul Kurtz (10 September 2013). The Transcendental Temptation: A Critique of Religion and the Paranormal. Prometheus Books. pp. 403–. ISBN 978-1-61614-828-7.
  16. ^ "Magician believes Tina Resch created house monster". (Associated Press) Beaver County Times. Mar 15, 1984.
  17. ^ "Paranormal events can't withstand close scrutiny, researcher says". The Milwaukee Journal. May 31, 1984. Retrieved 14 November 2013.
  18. ^ "Mother pleads guilty in fatal beating of girl". Rome News Tribune. Retrieved February 24, 2014.
  19. ^ "Caroll Case Due in Floyd". Rome News Tribune. October 21, 1994. Retrieved February 24, 2014.
  20. ^ "Psychic Mom Get Life for Murder of Toddler". Daily News. October 27, 1994. Retrieved February 24, 2014.
  21. ^ Harden, Mike (15 May 1993). "Victim or Perpetrator". Scripps Howard News Service. Retrieved 18 July 2017.
  22. ^ a b "'Mysteries' on Resch a Stumper Itself". The Columbus Dispatch (Home Final ed.). Newsbank. 23 May 1993. p. 03F. Retrieved 18 July 2017.
  23. ^ a b c "Georgia Department of Corrections". Retrieved June 22, 2025.
  24. ^ a b "Atlanta Journal Constitution "Telekinetic Mom" newspaper stories". October 25, 1994. Retrieved 2008-02-24. Articles on Tina Resch Boyer in the archives of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution published October 24, 1994.
  25. ^ Roll, William and Valerie Storey, Unleashed: Of Poltergeists and Murder: The Curious Story of Tina Resch, Simon & Schuster (2004). ISBN 978-0743482943
  26. ^ deliverance - A telekinetic teenager became a convicted killer. Can a group of strangers prove that Christina Boyer is really a victim of injustice? - by Lauren Markham, published in Atavist Magazine, number 100
  27. ^ Jan Banning & Christina Boyer - Das Urteil Jan Banning & Christina Boyer - The Verdict, Photonews, published April 2022, in German, consulted 11th of June 2025
  28. ^ Het oordeel: Buiten redelijke twijfel The verdict: beyond reasonable doubt, Dutch Photography Museum, Rotterdam, Netherlands, press statement, published 1st of February 2022, in Dutch, consulted 11th of June 2025
  29. ^ Jan & Christina NTR/Radio 1, Netherlands, in Dutch, consulted 11th of June 2025
  30. ^ The Verdict: The Christina Boyer Case John Adams Institute, consulted 11th of June 2025
  31. ^ 2019 Making An Exoneree Cases Georgetown University, consulted 11th of June 2025
  32. ^ Christina Boyer has been wrongfully incarcerated for 33 years, 56 days, (...)