Talk:Ziph (Bible)

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Grena not an acceptable source

Robb Andrew Young: "The non- academic, and lamentably derisive, work of G. M. Grena" is nevertheless useful for its substantial collection of previous scolarly work. If Young is right, Grena is a ridiculous amateur, and his self-published book can only be used as a compendium of work done by others.

If so, totally non-RS.

Its content is not accessible online, we cannot check if the theory based on Grena is his own OR, or a plausible interpretation coming from a serious scolar. Unless this inf. is included in a detailed quotation, the whole paragraph needs to be removed. Arminden (talk) 11:35, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]