Talk:With Devils Amongst Us All/GA1

GA review

Pass LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 21:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LastJabberwocky (talk · contribs) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm picking up your nomination! I did minor edits myself, if you disagree, we can discuss them here. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LastJabberwocky addressed things said. sorry i feel high off of tiredness (idk how) so i may appear jivey but i am serious. thank you for doing this!!! // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm almost went off to sleep, but got infected [sic] by your high-energy typing! I'll close the review tomorrow. LastJabberwocky (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

infected?? damn never thought ida be a social contagion. dw take y time Chchcheckit (talk) 22:17, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your article, I'm really enjoying going back and free people from their old nominations! Closing the review LastJabberwocky (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Background and recording

Walls of Jericho began working on new material in December 2005, and spent four or five months writing With Devils Amongst Us All. I think you should switch "new material" and "With Devils Amongst Us All"; to first introduce the material we talking about, then call it new material. Walls of Jericho began working on With Devils Amongst Us All in December 2005, spending four or five months writing the new material. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

tweaked Chchcheckit (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

and as such his input was limited to requested areas, or whenever he "saw something that needed to be changed". This sentence is really bothering me, because its two parts contradict themselves "input was limited to requested areas" but also he made imput "if he saw something that needed to be changed", so not really limited. I know you quote the source and you pretty closely to it, but can we rephrase it to make it more clear, OR we can include the whole quote to clean our hands and put the embarrassment of an contradiction on Candace Kucsulain :). LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alternatively, this "if he saw something that needed to be changed" could've been limited to ONLY the requested areas. In any case, this sentence can be tweaked. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

regarding kucsulain's contradictions (sorry had to reference) uhhh yeah. was written when heart and mind defined contradictions amirite // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Composition and lyrics

Drowned in Sound doesn't explicitly say the genre is hardcore; the reviewer seem to express a general feeling they got when listening the album. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i did put that in a note "(just hardcore???)" so i agree with you. also thank you for doing this // Chchcheckit (talk) 20:28, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

about finding the person you love, and overcoming what stops you from being with that person. → about finding the loved one, and overcoming the obstacles barring from being with that person. Reason: substituting the cases of "you" LastJabberwocky (talk)

redid // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look at this one again, I feel it can be better (saying to my version and the current version on the page). LastJabberwocky (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Release and promotion

The band said they would perform four or five new songs during the tour. Did they perform them? If there aren't a clear answer, I would remove the sentence. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think in some concert review this is true but honestly idk if i really matters Chchcheckit (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

in other words removed Chchcheckit (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Links and sources

Are you sure "visual-music.org" is reliable? "With Devils Amongst Us All" is the only page on the wiki that uses it, and there are no discussions about it. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
in any cases i will remove. idk about the singles thing honestly or if it counts so f it im cuttin it // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:05, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It would be nice to get primary link for KERRANG! review, instead of roadrunner records link. In the best case scenario. LastJabberwocky (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
i am broke as is, and was also broke when i made the page lmao. i made do but yeah i understand. i obtained rock sound bc i thought it had an interview. the review was useful, but instead of interview, woj article it led to me writing Scratch the Surface ( Facepalm ?) Chchcheckit (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
clarification: i got the rock sound issue (the roadrunner link had the review, so does magazine) bc i thought it had an interview. instead it had a list of records the band were inspired by. chris rawson named scratch the surface and at that point i decided to work on that. what followed were many sleepless nights and walkless days // Chchcheckit (talk) 21:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't buy KERRANG, the link is good enough for the purposes of sourcing the review. It's just a wiki aesthetic to find the first-hand source. LastJabberwocky (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

28.6%. Copyvios picks up only the album name, song names, people names. Y