Talk:Wipeout
Appearance
![]() | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:11, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Wipe out → Wipeout – Of the 14 uses currently disambiguated here, 12 are spelled "Wipeout" (and 1 of the remaining 2 is "Wipe Out", not "Wipe out"). Theoldsparkle (talk) 20:23, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment seems to be missing a redirect from wipe-out. 70.49.127.194 (talk) 04:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Nom's reasoning is sound. Jenks24 (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support: not sure if this is a policy or guideline but just seems logical. –CWenger (^ • @) 06:26, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.