Jump to content

Talk:Washington Report on Middle East Affairs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

[edit]

Policy on listing contributors

[edit]

I agree one should ref people have been contributors, at least with one article published from the publication, per WP:BLP. However, a) I don't think this is such terribly "contentious" material it has to be removed immediately. And I disagree with the excuse that "wikipedia is not a list" for mentioning contributors.

So I am putting that back with the same tag I am now putting on another publication I just noticed with that problem, Front Page Manazine. CarolMooreDC 17:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


WP:LEAD

[edit]

restore per WP:LEAD states that the lead should summarize the article . The article does bot say that "representatives of pro-Israel organizations" have criticized WRMEA, it list such critics, not all of whom fit that title. Can you say why such yellow-badging is needed in the lead? The Ultimate Washing Machine (talk) 06:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since I find your cynical and unethical exploitation the term yellow-badging repulsive and unacceptable, no, I won't respond to your question. Come back when you have acquired a basic level of common decency and I'll think about responding. Sean.hoyland - talk 06:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am unmoved by your personal attacks. If you won't respond, I shall restore the consensus version that has been in the article for a long time. The Ultimate Washing Machine (talk) 06:17, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this guy is a sock, put {{subst:socksuspectnotice|PUPPETMASTER}} per WP:SPI on there. Thanks. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 14:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile I do agree with Sean.Hoyland's edit since that longstanding sentence includes two wikilinks that reflect the content as opposed to two POV phrases that do not and thus also will revert it. Looking at this article, I can see it has been attacked by various socks before so I can see where he's coming from, though I certainly don't know if it is true. 'CarolMooreDC - talk to me🗽17:18, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 April 2025

[edit]

Update publisher to American Educational Trust. 2600:387:15:1A:0:0:0:2 (talk) 18:58, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Good day—RetroCosmos talk 00:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]