Talk:W8 engine

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[list of Volkswagen Group petrol engines#3.6 VR6 FSI 206kW|Volkswagen 3.6-litre VR6]] The anchor (3.6 VR6 FSI 206kW) has been deleted.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

???

why are all the VRx links (VR4, VR5, and VR6) pointed to V6 engine? 21:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

I've no clue. I removed links for VR4 and VR5 (articles don't exist), and made VR6 point to VR6 engine. James Bubeck 02:37, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"and is mounted in a better manner"

Maybe rephrase "and is mounted in a better manner". In what way is it mounted in a better manner? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.79.167.152 (talk) 07:07, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]