Jump to content

Talk:Venus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleVenus is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starVenus is part of the Solar System series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 28, 2005.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
May 10, 2006Featured article reviewDemoted
June 16, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
October 15, 2006Featured topic candidatePromoted
January 8, 2008Featured article reviewKept
August 27, 2008Featured topic candidateNot promoted
June 26, 2016Featured article reviewKept
June 13, 2021Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
June 20, 2022Featured topic candidatePromoted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 15, 2020.
Current status: Featured article


Presence of Phosphine on Venus

[edit]

The statement "By late October 2020, re-analysis of data with a proper subtraction of background did not result in the detection of phosphine" seems to have now itself been rendered outdated by the original team[1] who has now found a smaller amount of phosphine but still seems to have found phosphine none the less. Maybe amending this section to say the status of phosphine is still uncertain considering the multiple contradictory analyses of the atmosphere are now available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmesco17 (talkcontribs)

References

  1. ^ Greaves, Jane. "Re-analysis of Phosphine in Venus' Clouds". arXiv. Retrieved 16 Nov 2020.

Phosphine is confirmed.

[edit]

[1] 21 Andromedae (talk) 18:08, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Clements, David L. (2024-09-20). Venus Phosphine: Updates and lessons learned. KAVLI-IAU SYMPOSIUM (IAUS 387). arXiv:2409.13438.

Paragraph on early spectroscopic observations is misleading

[edit]

Hi!

I suggest removing or rewriting the paragraph about Slipher's 1903 observations:

"Spectroscopic observations in the 1900s (...) than had previously been thought".

It says his spectroscopic work gave early clues about Venus's rotation, but that's misleading. He was observing sunlight reflected off Venus's cloud tops in visible wavelengths (paper), so unknowingly, he wasn't observing the planet itself, just the upper atmosphere. So it not relevant to the actual planetary rotation.

And today we know those clouds rotate quickly (in 4-5 days, paper), not 225 days as inferred by Lowell from Slipher's null result. His observations likely missed something. Maybe because of this, modern literature doesn't really cover Slipher's observations.

I recommend removing the paragraph entirely? We could also try rephrasing it. But it would need to clearly explain that he only observed the fast-rotating cloud tops, so then, why keep a paragraph saying he detected slow rotation? LazyAssed Contender (talk) 09:42, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that you can delete that paragraph all together. It has a primary ref but I did not find significant other coverage. I used the other ref for a sentence in the Atmosphere section. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]