Talk:Transit Access Pass

Trains: Rapid transit / Operations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 28, 2011

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by the Operations task force.

Transit agencies outside of L.A. County

OCTA (Orange County) accepts TAP on a few lines. Is there any possibility they and other nearby counties will fully adopt TAP in the near future? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.45.171 (talk) 00:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Transit Access Pass. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TAP cards aren't blue or orange anymore

i saw that in the article, it said that the tap card was blue (or orange). it needs to be updated because the tap card as of 2019 has a design on it. it's true, however, that tap cards do have blue or orange backgrounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Transit Productions820 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create a list of Special/Limited edition TAP Cards

Metro has a strong community of collectors, and a robust catalog of special editions that reflect the company and the region.

A new page with a list of all of the cards, designs and release dates would be helpful, especially since no comprehensive list currently exists Vrbanite (talk) 20:47, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vrbanite: Yes I agree, Oyster card already does something similar. You could probably expand this idea to other smartcards around the US that have limited edition designs, from memory I believe SmarTrip card do them too? Internationally, I believe Octopus card and EZ-Link card have special designs too. Fork99 (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

transitcards [dot] xyz maintains a basically complete list, and Metro has a (few?) physical folder(s) with most released designs - I'm not sure what the sourcing requirements are for something like this though. Auvon (talk) 06:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 20 July 2025

It has been proposed in this section that Transit Access Pass be renamed and moved to TAP card (Los Angeles County).

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Transit Access Pass → TAP card (Los Angeles County) – Per WP:COMMONNAME, the full name is not used in colloquialism. Per WP:SECONDARY, secondary sources also commonly refer to it as "TAP card." OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 05:10, 20 July 2025 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 01:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Would "Los Angeles" work as a disambiguator? (Shorter than "Los Angeles County") Jruderman (talk) 23:45, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fine with it, it may actually be preferable due to its brevity. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Los Angeles TAP card ? -- 65.93.183.181 (talk) 09:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I've definitely considered that too; it could be a bit more natural. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 10:10, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Trains/Operations task force, WikiProject Rapid transit, and WikiProject Trains have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 01:41, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Note that TAP card is an existing redirect to this article; Tap card is not. Per WP:DIFFCAPS, TAP card (Los Angeles County) could be seen as unnecessary disambiguation. 162 etc. (talk) 02:42, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah if "TAP card" currently only redirects here and there's nothing else using that name, not sure if we need the disambiguating parenthetical. --Jfruh (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Ah, well, I was under the impression that TAP card by itself was ambiguous when it was contested as a technical request. If it's unambiguous, then yeah, the disambiguation is redundant. Support moving to TAP card. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]