Talk:Timeline of US intervention in the Syrian civil war

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Syria–United States relations#Under President Trump|overseeing the Syrian intervention]]

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Large infobox

Should the , cumbersome infobox be necessary for this timeline article, since it's the exact same infobox on the parent article? RopeTricks (talk) 08:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russian president Vladimir Putin's visit to the Mariamite Cathedral of Damascus

This conversation seems out of place, given the article topic. I like it because its a dig at Trump, but other than that I'm not sure it fits in here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.39.41.4 (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, not very relevant to anything. Serves more to take a dig at Trump then serve any actual informational value. RopeTricks (talk) 16:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very long

This article is too long to read and navigate comfortably. When the tag was added, its readable prose size was 20,969 words. Consider splitting content into sub-article or condensing it. The article size impacts usability in multiple ways: Reader issues, such as attention span, readability, organization, information saturation, etc. (when articles are large). Total article size should be kept reasonably low, particularly for readers using slow internet connections or mobile devices or who have slow computer loading. Some large articles exist for topics that require depth and detail, but typically articles of such size are split into two or more smaller articles.

Word count	What to do
this article 20,969 words	Divided or trimmed
> 15,000 words	Almost certainly should be divided or trimmed.
> 9,000 words	Probably should be divided or trimmed.

— Isaidnoway (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2025 (UTC)—[reply]