Talk:Strong Court
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Strong Court article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Did you know nomination
[edit]
( )
- ... that the Strong Court, despite its name, was under the weak leadership of Chief Justice Samuel Henry Strong?
- Source: "Effective leadership of the Court was, at least at times, passing from Strong's hands" (Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 62). "Henry Strong seemed to dominate the court, and under his leadership, or lack thereof, the court spiralled downward in the estimation of both the bar and the public." (Ian Bushnell, 1992, p 168)
- ALT1: ... that the Strong Court was created by the appointment of Samuel Henry Strong to the role of Chief Justice of Canada, despite Strong's many attempts to resign from the Court? Source: "Several times between 1884 and 1888 Strong actually tendered his resignation. He had stayed on at the prime minister's request, but in 1888 Sir John A. Macdonald finally gave way, writing to the minister of justice: 'I have written Strong. You would grant his pension. He may as well go.' Strong did not go, however." (Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 45)
- ALT2: ... that despite its name, the Strong Court did not have the respect of the Canadian legal community or public? Source: "Equally unfortunate was the entrenchment of the public's generally negative perception of the institution. A Toronto law journal commented in 1896 that 'this Court has long lacked the confidence of the Bar, both in the English-speaking provinces and in Quebec, and the present state of affairs will minimize what confidence still exists." AND "The Court's reputation remained poor; the editor of the Canada Law Journal wrote privately that the Supreme Court 'is held in Contempt by the profession.'"(Snell and Vaughan, 1985, p 58, 79)
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I think the name of the court can be used to make a good pun, but I am having difficulty thinking of one
Created by Caddyshack01 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
Caddyshack01 (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2025 (UTC).
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Unassessed Canadian law articles
- Low-importance Canadian law articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Unassessed law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Wikipedia articles that use Canadian English
- Articles that have been nominated for Did you know