Talk:Slumming

This article was nominated for deletion on September 29, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

— JIP | Talk 08:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV tagging

This article is very coloured in its angle, and doesn't have any sources. Added NVOP

Slumming

I think that the article makes a good start, and, for what it is worth, I like its tone; it accords well with my own impressions of what "slumming" is about. For further development: discussion of the topic on a gradient leading from ideas about poverty to "the prosperity of poverty," bohemianism, slumming, and finally to certain forms of ethnography to class tourism. Tkatvgps (talk) 10:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

agree, that is what I remember reading about slumming. I don't see no pov bias here. just need a few more references, that's it. i'm gonna load in a frank leslie photo of a slum tour later on. Lucky dog (talk) 03:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality

The article is very short of references and of doubtful objectivity. Ideally it should be based on examples from more than just London and New York.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]