Talk:Siew C. Ng

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 June 2025 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Talk:Siew C. Ng

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

I am a colleague of Professor Siew C. Ng at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. I have revised this draft with independent sources (e.g., South China Morning Post, Nature Portfolio, BBC Science Focus, HKTDC Research, News-Medical.net, Research Communities by Springer Nature) to address notability and avoid self-promotion. I welcome editorial feedback. SiewNg (talk) 07:18, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments left by AfC reviewers

Comment: I did note that she is a named professor, so have left this comment to alert you. I will now resubmit on your behalf and accept. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:50, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: You have a referencing issue, but not in the way you might expect.
It is WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.
Citekill creates WP:BOMBARD, which gives the impression that you are desperate prove notability. This is not needed. They either pass WP:BIO, or the more targeted WP:NPROF or they do not. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 07:48, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing Article Issues

I have added internal links to improve integration and will review talk page comments for cleanup. As a colleague of Siew C. Ng, I’ve disclosed COI and will seek neutral edits. Suggestions welcome! SiewNg (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]