Talk:Shock site
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shock site article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you are wondering why a certain shock site does not have an entry here, please check the archive index below to be aware of prior discussions. If you want to discuss one of these sites again, leave your message on this page. |
---|
We need images for this page
[edit]I think it would help a lot 2600:100E:B0A3:F4D6:3CE5:96DE:4988:87EA (talk) 20:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- What kinds of images?
- 5.173.180.59 (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Notable shock images (especially from the "golden age" in the 00s) that have copyright licenses compatible with Wikipedia policy.
- Or really anything, even if it's obscure, due to the inherent difficulty in sorting out the copyright issues. Many notable images were taken from copyrighted pornography. Hunting down the licensing, or creators, is like finding hay in a burning needlestack.
- Maybe a Wikipedian should make a shock image for demonstrative purposes? LesbianTiamat (She/Her) (troll/pester) 07:27, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
"LemonParty" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect LemonParty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 3 § LemonParty until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
"LemonParty.org" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect LemonParty.org has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 24 § much more obvious lemonparty noms to nonexistent mentions yaaay until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 13:13, 24 April 2025 (UTC)