Jump to content

Talk:Sequoia sempervirens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleSequoia sempervirens was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 17, 2005Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History Fall 2024

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lyons10 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lyons10 (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seto porcelain clay Formation

[edit]

@Bubblesorg: Miki 1944 is not acceptable as its outdated and a VERY brief search shows it. This paper on page 16 footnote 2 it specifically calls out that Miki transferred the fossils from Sequoia sempervirens Endl to Sequoia couttisie Heer (sic -S. couttsiae) in 1965. After that transfer we have the change in generic placement of "S". couttsiae to become the type species of Quasisequoia as Q. couttsiae (Heer), L. Kunzmann, 1999. All while the fossils themselves have not been reexamined and restudied since at least 1965 if not since Miki's initial work in the early 1940's. Fossil plants are much more convoluted then fossil animals and you have to be VERY diligent with researching before you add statements to articles.--22:59, 24 May 2025 (UTC) Kevmin § 22:59, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]