Talk:SS Dixie Arrow/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: PhoenixCaelestis (talk · contribs) 13:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Yummifruitbat (talk · contribs) 23:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article. Happy to discuss any of my comments, and second opinions (including drive-by/unsolicited) are welcome at any point. YFB ¿ 23:47, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for being willing to do this! PhoenixCaelestis (Talk · Contributions) 17:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

GA review

Last updated: 17:05, 22 June 2025 (UTC) by PhoenixCaelestis

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written

1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

Yes, a well-written article. I made a few minor copyedits while reviewing.

1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check

2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

2c) it contains no original research

2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism

3) Broad in its coverage

3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

Good breadth, and the content seems well balanced.

3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

No concerns.

4) Neutral:

4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

Yes

5) Stable:

5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio

6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Good use of media with informative captions.

Overall: