This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park
This article was copy edited by Tdslk, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 27 April 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
I have just added archive links to one external link on Riegelmann Boardwalk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
YAn editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
ALT2:... that before the Riegelmann Boardwalk was built, Coney Island was estimated to have 1.4 square inches (9.0 cm2) of public beachfront for each of the 3.7 million residents of New York City? Source: Devine, Edward Thomas; Kellogg, Paul Underwood (1904). The Survey. Survey Associates. p. 901, 905
I would have been shocked if you had only just in July 2019 created the article on the Coney Island boardwalk. You must've chosen the wrong entry in the template since the article was created by someone else in November 2008. And yet, this was the article before you started working on it. Oy vey. It's the CONEY ISLAND BOARDWALK! One of the most iconic places in NYC.... Okay, I'll get off my New Yorker soapbox and review now.
Article is newly expanded more than five-fold. The article is well sourced, appears neutrally written, and is probably not far from GA status. (Honestly when I saw "Coney Island Boardwalk" here, I thought it was a newly promoted GA nom. Okay I digressed again...
Hook facts are validated by inline citations, and interesting enough. I'm adding a wikilink to Edward J. Riegelmann in the main proposed hook. @Epicgenius:, if you want to propose an image, I'll add the image review. Pending QPQ, hence the nom is not yet approved. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]