Talk:Receiver (statue)/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Easternsahara (talk · contribs) 19:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I do not think that two sentences warrants a seperate "Legacy" section, I believe that this section should be merged with "History"

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No edit wars having ever taken place on the article, last edit on 26 March, last major on 4 days ago.

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Illustrated with two images, enough for an article of this size. Both have appropriate copyright.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I will be continuing my review later. It seems likely that this will be promoted. Easternsahara (talk) 19:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)