Talk:Pro-ROC camp

Hong Kong Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (34)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (63) • B-Class articles (321)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,160)

Image needed (342)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,869) • Stub-Class articles (6,735)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,431)

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

I am firmly against changing the phrase "Before 1984, now actions:" to "Before 1984:". China Youth Service & Recreation Center is conservative, not liberal. ProKMT (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

China Youth Service & Recreation Center is not conservative (HK), it was a mistype without a source. Guotaian (talk) 09:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

@Guotaian: In the current article, there are too many templates. Of course, the Pro-ROC camp belongs to 'liberalism in Hong Kong' and 'conservatism in Taiwan', but there are too many templates, which distorts the image placement and even lowers the readability.[1] So I think we need to remove the 2 templates.[2] ProKMT (talk) 08:48, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested a third opinion. Unlike the article's talk page, in the article's history, there were countless debates and editorial wars through edit summaries. ProKMT (talk) 08:57, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]