Jump to content

Talk:Origin of Latter Day Saint polygamy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Weather or not polygamy started with Joseph Smith is highly controversial

[edit]

1. Some large fraction of LDS do not believe that Joseph Smith practiced Polygamy. 2. DNA refutes such claims. 3. The Joseph Smith Papers seems to refute such claims. To get started, see: A. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnBUfIDl0gE B. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6Jn7wbAvuY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:600:C581:F960:9F33:94B3:C7DE:1E96 (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Origin of Latter Day Saint polygamy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style standardization

[edit]

I propose to standardize this article's citation template style per WP:CITESTYLE which says "citations within any given article should follow a consistent style". For example, I've recently done so on Mormonism and polygamy, Mormonism and violence, God in Mormonism, and Temple garment. Are there any opposed to me making the citation style uniform to inline "cite x" and "ref name" for this article? If anyone is opposed, are they willing to volunteer to do the standardizing labor to make it all "harv" style? I'm only willing to take the time to standardize it all to the "cite x" form I'm more familiar and comfortable with. In my opinion, arguing to just leave it at the status quo with the mixed styles, without offering to correct it isn't constructive, and a bit like status quo stonewalling. If I don't receive any opposing volunteers who will standardize it all to "harvnb" within a week or so I'll go ahead and standardize it all to "cite x"/"ref name". I would also try to make other citation improvements during my potential review of the sources. Pastelitodepapa (talk) 00:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]