Talk:Organic Maps

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 February 2022 by reviewer Artem.G (talk · contribs).

Maps

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

CoMaps page?

Is the new CoMaps project big enough yet to have its own page or should it remain as a part of the organic maps page? Pacrat173 (talk) 03:38, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bit soon. Let the fork cook for a bit. The "notability" at the moment is that OM did get forked, not that CoMaps has become an established project — GhostInTheMachine ^{talk to me} 11:00, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I felt it was soon too but I just wanted to see what others thought Pacrat173 (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article is up, and now LWN wrote about it too. --Andrej Shadura (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]