Talk:Operational definition

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operational definition article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Science / Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science
	Philosophy of language

Linguistics: Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): 8DBienaime.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

who molested this page

This page used to explain operational definitions as used in science in a concise and clear way. Right now it looks like an exercise in disinformation to prevent readers from understanding the concept. Can we revert it to a sane state, please? Vaceituno (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Boyd reference to Bridgman's work appears to be incorrect (or at least is not directly helpful)

Under the "Phiolosophy" heading, this article references an article by Boyd (in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) which suggests Bridgman's work on operational definitions was from 1914. However, when I went to the Stanford Encyclopedia article, I could not find any reference to Bridgman or to 1914. But it did mention "operationalism" a lot!! ^_^

So I checked the Stanford Encyclopedia definition of "operationalism" and there I hit the jackpot!! It talks all about Bridgman's work and ties it to his 1927 book "The Logic of Modern Physics". It also gives the context for the 1914 date - according to that article, that is when Bridgman first taught special relativity and teaching it caused him to think much more deeply about how concepts should be defined.

The Wikipedia page on Bridgman *also* mentions his work on operational definitions and *also* references that 1927 book.

So I think that the reference to the Boyd article in the Stanford Encyclopedia should be changed to the definition of "operationalism" in the Stanford Encyclopdedia, or possibly to the Wikipedia article on Bridgman itself.

I wonder if the Boyd article was edited and specific mentions of Bridgman and the 1914 experience were taken out (or moved to the "operationalism" definition page instead). 64.22.249.253 (talk) 17:10, 21 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(b. hinrichs)