Jump to content

Talk:Official hijackers of the 2001 attacks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

So, waiting for the afd...--Striver 19:55, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No AfD but the title needs renaming. Only half of those discussed in here are hijackers, and you need to be more specific than "2001 attacks". that and the typo. --Mmx1 20:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest "Hijackers of the September 11, 2001 attacks" to follow the format of Survivors of the September 11, 2001 attacks; don't need the term "official" since some on the list, frankly, aren't. --mtz206 20:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And the "People claimed to be responsible" should be removed, since they aren't hijackers, official or suspected. --mtz206 20:19, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, there's already a Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. This probably belongs there. --Mmx1 20:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're right. That article already lists the hijackers, just could use the suspected 20th or wrongly accused sections merged. --mtz206 20:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Two points. First, because of the typo, this shouldn't be a redirect. Second. I thought about separating "organizers" from "hijackers", but there's really no point. This was a much more complex operation than walking on a plane and announcing you have a bomb, and "organizers" is a better description of their role than merely the most visible step of it. --Mmx1 20:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the above points that the "People claimed to be responsible" are beyond the scope of this article and are discussed in Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks. I also agree that the article should be kept, but renamed to Hijackers of the September 11, 2001 attacks - consistent with how other articles are named. -Aude (talk | contribs) 20:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I've looked through the Organizers of the September 11, 2001 attacks article, I think an article on the hijackers is redundant and not needed. -Aude (talk | contribs) 21:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was bold and merged the article to the "organizers" article. Revert me if you dissagre. Peace. --Striver 11:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]