Talk:ORCID
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ORCID article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 28 days ![]() |
![]() | A fact from ORCID appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 December 2009, and was viewed approximately 668 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | ORCID has a Wikipedian in Residence, User:Pigsonthewing. The role is described in Announcing ORCID's Wikipedian-in-Residence. Please see WP:ORCID, or contact the Wikimedian in Residence if you have any questions, or require their assistance in that capacity. |
Good critique
[edit]- Baglioni, Miriam; Manghi, Paolo; Mannocci, Andrea; Bardi, Alessia (31 December 2021). "We Can Make a Better Use of ORCID: Five Observed Misapplications". Data Science Journal. 20: 38. doi:10.5334/dsj-2021-038.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
incoherence.
[edit]Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems to me that the first sentence in this article doesn't really make sense. Cuniform Grocery List (talk) 18:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. The issue resulted from a combination of two edits, [1] and then [2]. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:42, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Applying
[edit]Do authors apply for an ID for themselves or are they registered by somebody else? Is it intended also for authors who can't apply for themselves, such as say, Isaac Newton or Marie Curie? -- Error (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- I see that Isaac Newton has one ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-1097 but I don't see one in Curie's article. --Error (talk) 17:51, 5 March 2025 (UTC)
- The Newton ID was bogus. Removed. Only living people may register for an ORCID iD, and as the scheme was launched in 2012, no-one who died before than can have one. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks. Can you add that with a reference to the article?
- --Error (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Newton ID was bogus. Removed. Only living people may register for an ORCID iD, and as the scheme was launched in 2012, no-one who died before than can have one. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)