This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
I removed "The cartoon dually referred to U.S. president Obama and to the recent rampage of Travis, a former chimpanzee actor." [User:Objective3000|Objective3000]] later changed "It [i.e. the cartoon] was criticized ..." to "Comparing Obama, a Black president, to a chimpanzee was criticized ..." I have the same objection as I made in my edit summary: this is wikivoiced CNN speculation that the cartoon was about Mr Obama, though the cartoonist had told CNN "It's absolutely friggin ridiculous." Any other opinions? Peter Gulutzan (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your first cite says "has been widely criticized" and then points to an earlier article where e.g. a politician says the Post should clarify after hearing about Sharpton's remarks; your second cite says "appeared to compare"; your third cite says "some have interpreted as comparing" and quotes Sharpton; your fourth cite says "Many critics said", etc. You decided that mush merits wikivoicing something which cannot be established except by telepathy. It's plausible that one of the policemen is suggesting the bill could have been written by a chimpanzee; Mr Obama did not write the bill. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Of course the president didn't personally write the bill. The cartoon caption was "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill. Follow the link and Obama is mentioned 22 times. The officer shoots a chimpanzee suggesting that the chimpanzee wrote the bill pushed by the first Black president. Murdoch apologized for the cartoon and Sean Delonas, the Post cartoonist responsible for the monkey image, has frequently been accused of bigotry.[5]O3000, Ret. (talk) 14:38, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
