This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult
An IP keeps removing the influence of the far-right on ORT, despite it being well sourced. It's not like it's controversial, Origas was a Neo-Nazi, the far-right influence on ORT is well attested and not personal bias from the authors. Also, using "personal documents" to prove something here is WP:OR, when the source says it was OSMTJ. PARAKANYAA (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This has been resolved. The far-right thing is true but that has its own page now so it's not needed here. The second thing was found in a different book. PARAKANYAA (talk) 05:16, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheLionHasSeen This topic is rife with fringe and legends. We should not be using individual sources not about this topic (WP:SYNTH) to cherry pick information into the article. The sources you are adding 1) never mention "neo-Templarism" so are synth as used here 2) are antiquated and unreliable due to the massive change in understanding of this topic. It is also just not written well. I do not understand why you insist on adding this material cited to poor, foreign language sources. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:04, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The sources add to support the information that was added into the article, and they can be reliable if you also use foreign-language sources. Plenty of articles do this. - TheLionHasSeen (talk) 16:52, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
They are not reliable sources. They are not unreliable because they're foreign language (I was indicating that English language sources are usually preferred) but they are so old as to be unreliable for this topic where our understanding has changed massively. They are also synth because they are unrelated to the topic of the article and don't even mention neo-Templarism, so why would we use them to say something about neo-Templarism? PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=small}