Talk:Neaetha bulawayoensis

Neaetha bulawayoensis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 7, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Africa: Lesotho / South Africa / Uganda / Zimbabwe Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lesotho (assessed as Low-importance).
	South Africa portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Africa (assessed as Low-importance).
	Uganda portal This article is supported by WikiProject Uganda (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Zimbabwe (assessed as Low-importance).
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Spiders Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spiders, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spiders on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpidersWikipedia:WikiProject SpidersTemplate:WikiProject SpidersSpiders
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

GA review

Passed. Jens Lallensack (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Neaetha bulawayoensis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 17:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 02:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing now:

Can we have an easy in-text explanation of "clypeus", at least in the lead? Something like "(area below the eyes)"?
- Absolutely. Done.
but was moved to its current designation – better be clear: "but was moved to its current genus, Neaetha"
- Yes. Done.
that to understand the relationships between the different species requires the study of – grammar issue. Maybe "it is required to"?
- Ammended.
néos, which means new, and théa, which can be translated aspect – "new" and "aspect" need single quotes. You could use the gloss template (e.g., {{gloss|new}}
- Added.
It has a body is divided
- Amended.

Sources

The male has an abdomen that is ranges between 1.9 and 2.5 mm – can't find that in the sources? Give me a hint please.
- Amended. The sources say "Abdomen length 2.2, width 1.2" (Wesołowska & Cumming 2008, p. 202.) and "Abdomen: length 2.4–2.5/3.0, width 1.9/2.3" (Haddad & Wesołowska 2011, p. 93). I have also removed the duplicated conversions.

That's all, solid work! --Jens Lallensack (talk) 02:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jens Lallensack: Thank you for another very helpful review and the improvements you have made to the article as well. Please see my amendments and comments above and tell me if there is anything else you would like improved. simongraham (talk) 08:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Promoting now. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.