Talk:National Flagship

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Skippermakula (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is part of the Sea Scout Program. Visit: https://seascout.org/national-flagship/ for more information.

copvios report

3.8%. consisting of about five words.Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:59, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dlohcierekim: The current revision is okay; however, previous revisions were not. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:31, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. all is well now.Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:04, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89: Revdel done. I would like someone to look at current text in case it too closely paraphrases source.Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]