Talk:Nadav Shoval
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Mental Health Advocacy - relevance?
[edit]It appears that since nomination for deletion, the article has largely been tuned to (narrowly) meet WP:GNG, but reference to Shoval's mental health advocacy lacks citations and does not seem rise to standard of relevance. Unless such advocacy can be more adequately documented (I could not find anything substantial) and an argument offered as to the notability of these efforts, I suggest this should be excised from the article. JuniperusAsinus (talk) 08:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Reply to “Mental Health Advocacy – relevance?”
- Thank you for raising this. In reviewing the article for neutrality and verifiability, I did not find sufficient secondary sourcing to support any significant claims regarding Shoval’s involvement in mental health advocacy. As such, any previous references to this topic have been omitted in the course of recent cleanup.
- If high-quality, independent coverage becomes available in the future, it could be reconsidered, but for now, I agree that the content did not meet WP:V or WP:SIGCOV standards and have removed or refrained from including it accordingly.
- – PixelPilgrim (talk) 18:03, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
No conflict of interest – neutral edits for cleanup (April 2025)
[edit]Just noting for transparency: I am not connected to Nadav Shoval or OpenWeb in any way. I’m an independent editor working to improve the article by addressing neutrality concerns, updating citations, and reducing promotional language. Recent edits have focused on improving tone, strengthening sourcing, and adhering to Wikipedia’s content guidelines.
I’m happy to collaborate with others to continue refining the article. PixelPilgrim (talk) 17:51, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Tags removed – neutrality and COI addressed (April 2025)
[edit]Following a full review and series of edits, I’ve removed the
 | This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. |
and
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
tags from the article.
Peacock tag: Promotional or subjective language has been reworded throughout the article to align with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy. All statements are now phrased factually and are supported by inline citations to reliable sources. Connected contributor tag: I have no personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. I disclosed this earlier on the Talk page and am editing solely to improve tone, structure, and verifiability.
I welcome any additional review or suggestions for further refinement.
– 18:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)~~ PixelPilgrim (talk) 18:06, 18 April 2025 (UTC)