This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
NASA was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
NASA Edge was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into NASA. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
NASAcast was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 22 September 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into NASA. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
Text and/or other creative content from NASA was copied or moved into List of NASA aircraft with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, No consensus, 24 August 2006, discussion
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Not moved, 5 March 2015, discussion
RM, NASA → National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Not moved, 7 April 2022, discussion
Hi space nerd here. Couldn't help but notice that some dates are outdated or incorrect. I tried to edit it but apparently I'm not cleared for that. Can someone with the power to edit that? InterstellarNerd8760 (talk) 03:30, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article is semi-protected, so you need to have made at least ten edits to be allowed to edit it. You've made seven edits. You could put the dates you want to change here so someone else could update the article, but you'll be able to fix them yourself shortly. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 07:32, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@SarekOfVulcan: I think WP:SURPRISE is so that the linked art. almost exactly or exactly matches=is the same as the text / anchor. This is obvious as knowing a link - an important connecting meaning / information / understanding but not making the connection evident - i.e. if the link is the opposite: a "suprising" connection - is suprising the meaning as I understand it is as if the word opens into a completely not obvious and different art.. Obviously SUPRISE stops people from linking for no obvious meaning / reason - without the intelligence attached i.e. an explanation - content. With this premise, if you accept that is the meaning of SUPRISE; what did you think the problem of the link was? (𒌋*𓆏)𓆭23:50, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"a short paragraph about Dayton" the sub-heading "Dayton, Ohio" is "b. of a." so that isn't the case presumably easily that anyone thought to make the subheading the words which they are. 19:42, the v. you reverted links to the sub. which commences: "Powered aviation began in Dayton" - this is like reading: "Despite being the birthplace of avaiation" then nav. finding "Dayton" which is increasing the relevant information from the launch page. Page 1: birthplace-launch-Dayton gives the necessary reponse of query - if the spec. is "where in US" or the sense: need more info. on the important thing which is the beginning of something. If you would like to review the v. you reverted: NASA - Wikipedia - the linked art. from "Dayton" proceeds to provide relevant details informations. It isn't a para. about Dayton. I linked: "O. and W. Wright" so nav. for further satisfaction is now enabled. (𒌋*𓆏)𓆭01:25, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}
Done LizardJr8 (talk) 19:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)