This article is within the scope of WikiProject Concerts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of concerts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConcertsWikipedia:WikiProject ConcertsTemplate:WikiProject Concertsconcert
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mariah Carey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mariah Carey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mariah CareyWikipedia:WikiProject Mariah CareyTemplate:WikiProject Mariah CareyMariah Carey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
I'm currently working on this article and I believe the use of sfns is a better method for this style of article than regular footnotes. A lot of the sentences in the article, like in the concert synopsis and critical reception sections, are going to have multiple sources supporting one sentence due to information being recorded in various sources. I believe one footnote via sfn "[1]" makes the text easier to read than having something like "[10][11][43]." As per WP:CITEVAR I think you are supposed to seek consensus before changing the citation style. WP:PAREN notes that "some featured articles have three layers of footnote (explanatory note, short cite, and full cite)" and that is the goal here and thus the the ideal... Pinging Aoba47. Thanks! (I hope this isn't annoying I kind of want to do this elsewhere in the future?) Heartfox (talk) 01:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
