This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
ok, ill admit, i made this because i have a crush on one of the characters, but i want it to be approved, so give me any suggestions!
also im being held hostage help me Logan, Ohio 43138, United States TheActualDiamond (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
i know that i probably sound unprofessional, but i have a crush on N, come to think of it, all of my fictional crushes are robots... (or drones i guess xd) Serial designation X (talk) 03:55, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi everyone, I was looking through edit logs on this page, and I realise there's quite the dispute over the country of its origin. if we could please talk about it civilly here; that would be nice. I do not wish to get largely involved in this discussion as I mainly only do anti vandalism here. Please be kind to each other, and I hope we can talk this one through. Toaster914 (talk) Toaster914 (talk) 00:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I think it's Australia. N uses phrases like "Biscuits", which according to Bluey, is an Australian term. There are probably some other Australian things in the show, but I would have to rewatch it to make sure. Serial Designation C (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's origin is probably Australia because Glitch Productions is an Australian company but also Tessa talks in an Australian accent. MDFanGirlie (talk) 01:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd like to come to a consensus on how to spell "Absolute Solver" in the article. It's spelled in-show as "AbsoluteSolver" without the space, but because the credits and merchandise (namely this pin) use the space, it comes across as a stylistic spelling. I'm in favor of keeping it two words, but what are your thoughts? User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 22:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If it's a stylistic spelling, then I think we should use "Absolute Solver". Besides, it's grammatically correct and using the alternative would look like an IP user added it. SuperWikiBrother (talk) 23:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Last month, I clicked the link Cite 2024 Webby Awards Video Winners and it worked. Today, I check the cite with the link page not found. I look the Wayback Machine and I couldn't find it. 47.234.198.142 (talk) 04:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel like copper 9 is an earth analog because firstly earth exists and is a plot point, every human we see on copper 9 pre disaster is wearing spacesuits or some kind of helmet at least which implies that copper 9 does not have breathable air, plus it's not every earth like after the disaster but I could see that last point not mattering Skeletons are the axiom (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Uuuh. Hi. I think you should include a link in the line about Cyn disguising herself with Tessa's corpse that leads whoever clicks the link to the skin grafting page. Sorry if I have no idea what I'm doing with this request. LOL. 2603:7080:A3F:EF8A:CDEF:F03D:F781:79A9 (talk) 20:17, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Glitch Productions themselves have officially confirmed that it is intended for teens, just like TADC. There's no graphic violence and gore, it's just robots and oil, dumbass. Remove this genre. 188.163.109.136 (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, Murder Drones can still be an "adult animation" if it is defined as such. Executive producer Luke Lerdwichagul has already said, according to one source *already* cited in the main article on here, "We've seen our fans have an appetite for darker stories and that’s been great for us because it means we can explore more mature concepts that you might not associate with 3D animation." Also, he said, in another source cited in the main article on here, "As for our Glitch YouTube channel...we wanted to make our own original characters, so we focused on what we really enjoy, which is darker shows but with light-hearted comedy. That’s how Murder Drones came about and that has proved to be a great direction to go in."
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Saw that an article of mine was cited here and I'd like to make a minor touch-up since there's an error in the citation.
Can we replace
Writer GiovnanH wrote on his blogging website giovanh.com, praising the plot and animation quality, however he criticized the show for being hard to understand, especially for first-time viewers, pointing out its rapid pace,—which he attributed to an apparent compressing of the plot into an eight-episode series as a result of the limited budget of Glitch Productions—forced humour and troubled storytelling style, noting that several minute factors worked against each other to make the story harder to understand. Despite this, he overall gave the show a positive review, and recommended it to his readers.
with
Writer GiovanH criticized the show for being hard to understand, especially for first-time viewers (which he partially attributed to an apparent compressing of the plot into an eight-episode series as a result of the limited budget of Glitch Productions) noting that several minute factors worked against each other to make the story harder to understand. Despite this, he praised the plot and animation quality and gave the show a positive overall review, recommending it to his readers.
Not done: not a constructive request. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:50, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
