This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
A fact from Murad Agha appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Source: "Secondo le notizie più attendibili era Murâd Aghâ oriundo di Ragusa. Rapito giovanissimo da corsari e condotto in schiavitù a Costantinopoli vi diveniva mussulmano. ... Murâd Aghâ veniva nominato governatore della Tripolitania ..." (Bartoccini, Renato (1924). "La moschea di Murad Agha in Tagiura (Tripolitania)". Architettura e Arti decorative (in Italian). 3 (8): 337–346. Archived from the original on 12 February 2025.); "However, he is best remembered for the construction of the great mosque of Tajura, the design of which indicates that it was also intended to serve as a fortress against incursions by the Order of St John." (Mallia, David (2011). "The survival of the Knights' Church in Tripoli"(PDF). Proceedings of History Week: 29–45. Archived from the original(PDF) on 22 January 2019.)
Overall: The article is new enough (Created on 8 February) and long enough (3135 characters). It is well-sourced (every paragraph has a citation), neutral in tone, and free of plagiarism concerns (Earwig returns "violation unlikely" and didn't find any myself). The hook is interesting, and sentences supporting the hook within the article have end-of-sentence citations. QPQ has been provided. The image is free, used within the article, and clear at 100px. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Murad Agha, created on 8 February, is long enough, new enough, and well-sourced. No apparent copyvio. The hook is, again, cited and in the body. Interesting pair of articles. QPQ done. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg)
.svg)
The article is new enough (Created on 8 February) and long enough (3135 characters). It is well-sourced (every paragraph has a citation), neutral in tone, and free of plagiarism concerns (Earwig returns "violation unlikely" and didn't find any myself). The hook is interesting, and sentences supporting the hook within the article have end-of-sentence citations. QPQ has been provided. The image is free, used within the article, and clear at 100px. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC).
Murad Agha needs a review. -AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)
Murad Agha, created on 8 February, is long enough, new enough, and well-sourced. No apparent copyvio. The hook is, again, cited and in the body. Interesting pair of articles. QPQ done. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)