Talk:Multilingualism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Multilingualism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 12 months

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics High‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definition of multilingualism seems (too) narrow

The current article text contains:

”Multilingual people can speak any language they write in, but cannot necessarily write in any language they speak.”

Why would people who, by whatever cause or for whatever reason, do not speak one or some of the languages they master through other means, be they writing, signing or reading, excluded from being called multilingual?

I propose to change the text to e.g.:

”Multilingual people can communicate any language they master, but may not be able to communicate in it through all of its modes. Possible modes include speaking, writing, typing, morse-coding, signing, listening, reading, morse-decoding.”

Other modes may exist; I remember having read about a whistling language practised in Türkiye.Redav (talk) 14:09, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Roosevelt University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 15:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Structural problems in the article?

I've just stumbled upon this article and the way the sections are structured have confused me quite a bit. The most glaring one is a long list of languages and countries that speak them under the heading of Europe. At first I thought this was a list of either the European countries with shared languages (of which there are many) or a list of languages historically from Europe which are spoken widely in many countries (of which there are also a few). However, neither seems to be the case. To cite just one example which confused me, "Chinese in China, Taiwan, Singapore, and to a co-official extent in Malaysia and Brunei." I don't understand why this is included in this list. If there's a good reason, so be it. If not, or if otherwise there are no objections, I can take a crack at restructuring some of this. Rserramilli (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem with this section. For the languages that I know are spoken in different countries, they all seem correct. The only problem is that they are not limited to Europe. Lova Falk (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

bidirectional bilingual instruction

The text reads "bidirectional bilingual instruction". Could anyone clarify what this means? Thanks! 130.239.190.10 (talk) 15:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done I exchanged the term bidirectional for the more commonly used two-way, and wrote: a form of dual language education that brings together students from two different language backgrounds to learn in both languages. Lova Falk (talk) 08:30, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]