Talk:Mr. Beat

On 4 March 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Mr. Beat (disambiguation). The result of the discussion was not moved.

Rename to Mr. Beat (disambiguation)?

The Draft:Mr. Beat is almost ready and it makes more sense to call this a disambiguation rather than making the new Mr. Beat article Mr. Beat (YouTuber) or something like that. Liamlalaliam (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

that sounds reasonable. i'll put in a request Nucg5040 (meow at me - see what i've done) 16:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks man have a good one. Liamlalaliam (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 March 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 18:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Beat → Mr. Beat (disambiguation) – Mr. Beat the YouTuber is the main topic of Mr. Beat the name Nucg5040 (meow at me - see what i've done) 16:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose for now. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Naming the disambiguation page - when there is no article about the primary topic for the term, "(disambiguation)" is not placed on the title. Only when the draft is accepted by an AfC reviewer should they move this to "Mr. Beat (disambiguation)" and the draft to "Mr. Beat" via WP:RM/TM if necessary. ObserveOwl (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. Draft:Mr. Beat has not been accepted yet, so this is premature. 162 etc. (talk) 18:15, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the draft has been rejected, and I don't believe anything has changed since the deletion discussion to indicate that we should overturn the current consensus on notability. Based5290 :3 (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, for those like me who were unaware, there was an AFD in January. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Beat. Oppose. 162 etc. (talk) 21:25, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the AFD was split between keep and delete. Lertaheiko (talk) 21:51, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfD results are determined through strength of arguments, not pure !vote count. The likely canvassed comments without basis on policies or guidelines were discounted. If you believe the "delete" closure was wrong, discuss with the closing admin. ObserveOwl (talk) 22:01, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as this page does not exist. cookie monster 755 09:53, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as premature. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 18:06, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- no need to jump the gun. We don't need to shove an article for Beat into mainspace when it is not ready, otherwise the article will either just be speedied or brought to Afd again. I already elaborated about this on the nominator's talk page, though this move was requested before I reached out to them. If and when Beat does pass Afc criteria, the article can be moved back to where it originally was. Additionally, there is a chance that Mr. Beat (song) is notable in its own right as a redirect with possibilities, and that could attract a situation where there is no established topic, but we'll get to that junction if it happens. Billclinton1996 (talk) 05:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Move because it is a disambiguation page. Liamlalaliam (talk) 14:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are disambiguation pages without "(disambiguation)" in the title, like Georgia and New York. ObserveOwl (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.