Talk:Mopsea/GA1
GA review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:34, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: ZKevinTheCat (talk · contribs) 14:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Starting the GA review — ZKevinTheCat
Review
[edit]Pretty good article. I don't really have any major problems with it. I really only have one question: "Mopseidae" and "Mopseadae" are both given as spellings. Is this intentional?
Spot check:
[26] - good
[18] - good
[8] - good
ZKevinTheCat (talk) 06:33, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
- I haven't heard back from the nominator in a bit so I investigated this myself. The spelling is intentional, and I've left a clarifying note. With this disambiguated, I can now pass the article. Good work. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 07:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- @ZKevinTheCat My bad, I completely missed that! Yes, "Mopseadae" was an early 19th-century spelling, from the time when the nomenclature code wasn't as strict as it was today. Isididae was also originally called Isidae before being more correctly latinized. Sorry for the late reply! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)