Talk:Michael Bazyler

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

(Self?) Promotional Not Independent or Notable

I previously proposed deletion because the article appears to lack sufficient independent, in-depth secondary coverage per WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. While there are citations to book reviews, they are minimal, and the article reads more like a resume/bibliography than a balanced biographical entry. There’s little or no third-party coverage discussing Bazyler’s impact outside of his own publications. I’d like to open a discussion about whether the article meets Wikipedia’s notability standards. ~~~~

A9035 (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A9035 the correct place for that discussion would be wp:articles for deletion. although, the chance of success are low because of the reasons stated on your talk page. (t · c) buidhe 00:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]