Talk:Marcia Resnick
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What happened? I tried to correct mixed-up formatting (footnotes appearing twice and out of place)
[edit]The Marcia Resnick article seemed fine this morning but when I returned this afternoon to add a citation to an earlier book, the footnotes appeared twice and out of place. I tried adding sections as someone suggested, but to no avail. Help is needed.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
- There was a "closing bracket" (this thing: > ) for a ref tag that was missing in one of your inline citations. One little missing character can cause this kind of silliness where your references display in a really odd manner. I added the closing bracket and then re-added the reflist template. I think you can also safely re-add the defaultsort, but I wanted to keep it simple and make sure it fixed the formatting. EricEnfermero (Talk) 23:16, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 8 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- Stub-Class Women artists articles
- WikiProject Women artists articles