Talk:Majid Azami
Appearance
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 May 2025. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
BLP Policy Concerns – Request for Deletion
[edit]Hello,
I am submitting this request for the deletion of the article Majid Azami due to serious and multiple violations of Wikipedia’s Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy.
My concerns are as follows:
- The article makes serious and damaging allegations, including involvement in military oil sales and links to sanctioned groups, without balanced attribution or sufficient reliable sourcing.
- It relies heavily on politically affiliated or non-mainstream sources, such as Iran International, that do not meet the rigorous standards required for BLP content.
- The article omits a key fact: Majid Azami has filed a formal claim with the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to challenge the sanctions, and his request is currently under review. The absence of this information creates a misleading and incomplete narrative.
- Several claims are unsourced or vague, including the assertion that he is “one of the most influential” figures in his industry, which may amount to original research or editorial bias.
- Importantly, Majid Azami is a low-profile individual with limited public presence. BLP policy explicitly requires extreme caution in such cases, particularly when the content could cause harm.
Given these issues, I believe the article does not meet Wikipedia’s standards for BLPs and poses a reputational risk to a living person without due justification.
I request the article be considered for deletion in line with BLP policy.
Thank you. Segalbenis (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)