Talk:Main Page/Archive 209
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Main Page. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 205 | ← | Archive 207 | Archive 208 | Archive 209 |
Problem.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is this me or featured article are changing continuously because i have seen 4 FA in one day? Wh67890 (talk) 14:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- The featured article is the same. The image has been changed multiple times. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 14:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Correction: this Featured Article is making use of a random image template to give different images. I personally find it quite annoying, but at least it isn't resulting from an edit war. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 14:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- thank god, i thought my browser gone mad. Wh67890 (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Wow, I'm just impressed! Pharos (talk) 15:14, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Of what? Wh67890 (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Just that we apparently had a compromise on the lead image so complicated, it had to be implemented via a random image template. Pharos (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- It was reqested in the TFA nomination, and in the absence of policy to the contrary, I saw no reason not to grant it. I can't speak for my fellow coordinators in their scheduling, but I would only do so for a significant figure, even with the nominator putting in the work. Wehwalt (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Frequent change in the photo makes the same impression as of screen saver which many of us don't like. Wh67890 (talk) 17:13, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- I think it's kind of fun myself, no objection here. Pharos (talk) 18:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- It was reqested in the TFA nomination, and in the absence of policy to the contrary, I saw no reason not to grant it. I can't speak for my fellow coordinators in their scheduling, but I would only do so for a significant figure, even with the nominator putting in the work. Wehwalt (talk) 16:20, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Just that we apparently had a compromise on the lead image so complicated, it had to be implemented via a random image template. Pharos (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Of what? Wh67890 (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
- Correction: this Featured Article is making use of a random image template to give different images. I personally find it quite annoying, but at least it isn't resulting from an edit war. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 14:25, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.