Talk:Loml/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Riley1012 (talk) 19:49, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 07:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I will have my initial comments on this article up in the next few days. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

The song's lyrics mourn the loss of a short-lived relationship that leaves a long-lasting mark, using extensive imagery related to death such as phantoms, graveyards, and "Holy Ghost". add "the" before "Holy Ghost" and add the wikilink.

Same notes for this sentence: The lyrics of "Loml" recount a failed romantic relationship that was once full of promises and hopes but ended in devastation, using extensive death-related imagery of phantoms, "Holy Ghost", and graveyards.

She could not help but feeling like the whole romance was an illusion... Change "feeling" to "feel"

2. Verifiable
The sources used are reliable. The violation Earwig's is picking up is from a website appears to copy from Wikipedia. Spot check: 6, 8, 11, 17, 22, 30, 45, 47, 56, 64 - All fine.

3. Broad
The article covers the major aspects of the song.

4. Neutral
No concerns here.

5. Stable
The article is stable day-to-day.

6. Illustrated
No images, but the audio file is relevant and has non-free use rationale and a suitable caption.

Nice work Ippantekina. I've completed my review and left suggestions for improvement in the bullet points. -Riley1012 (talk) 20:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Riley1012 for the review. I've addressed your points accordingly :) Ippantekina (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, everything looks good now. Great job! -Riley1012 (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.