This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The new picture presents a lion that is quite famous and many articles mention him (including BBC, Whashington Post, etc.) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, etc.
The new picture presents a behavior of the lion which has educational value : it is standing on top of a lava rock that allows it to have a clear view of its territory.
The only reason I can see to add back the old image inside the article (but not as the lead image) is because of it's mane. The old image could therefore be added to the "Mane" section of the article where it could eventualy be relevant. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:40, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
"Dominance hierarchies do not appear to exist among individuals of either sex in a pride." I don't think that's completely accurate to how lions, particularly male lions, exist amongst each other. Sorry if I give sources incorrectly, I'm not a highly scientific person, I just really like lions.
If a lion pride is owned by a coalition/several males, there is always an established male then there are subordinate males. There are several studies that acknowledge this. "Whereas, in systems where per capita resources are scarce, lion coalitions are hierarchical and partners follow strict linear-dominance regimes (such as in the Gir forests of W. India which is primarily a woodland habitat with small modal prey and small female groups)." Chakrabarti S, Kolipakam V, Bump JK, Jhala YV 2020. I think it is worth it for someone smarter than me to look into it more, but that part of the wikipedia did catch my eye! 0verzealouz (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]