This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
If you have an argument for a merger, you're better off proposing it then pinging the one-year-dormant editor who made the article 12 years ago. Yue🌙18:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for suggesting this. I'd rather have two good articles, but this one is in such bad shape that it's the best of a bad situation. Bearian (talk) 02:01, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Few people would search on "labour is not a commodity". The article gets very few visits (the ILO article gets far more). It would be better to shift this content to the history section in the ILO page (where the left-wing origins of the ILO are mentioned). — Preceding unsigned comment added by DJJB621 (talk • contribs)
Thanks for these inputs. I think we have a consensus on merging, so I've just done the merger now. The content from this article was actually already included in the other one under "objectives" (I did that a few weeks ago).EMsmile (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]