Talk:Kerygma
![]() | This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
[Untitled]
[edit]the greek citation for the derivation of kerygma is incorrect. it reads (incorrectly) kepusso. the letter pi has been used in place of the correct letter, rho. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.5.246.222 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
to preach or proclaim – kerygma
[edit]This implies that kerygma is a verb, but the rest of the article suggests it is a noun. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.71.127.36 (talk) 17:37, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
NT kerygmata
[edit]Could this section mean that kerygma might mean proclamation?
lead paragraph summary
[edit]I would like to reinstate the lead summary based on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section In Wikipedia, the lead section is an introduction to an article and a summary of its most important contents
I think the section on the Catholic church is an important section that needs to appear in the lead. Thanks. Marax (talk) 03:47, 12 May 2025 (UTC)