This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graffiti, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to graffiti art, graffiti artists and all aspects of graffiti culture. Click Here for more information.GraffitiWikipedia:WikiProject GraffitiTemplate:WikiProject GraffitiGraffiti
It says that this person is a hacker and yet there is nothing in the article that so much as cover this topic. Also, what is MOCA? This acronym is never associated with a phrase.
This article has almost exclusively written by one SPA, in what might be called a neutral-promotional tone. Done in good faith, but, marked nonetheless as such. The subject of the article is unequivocally notable, but not without some controversy; in this article the controversy seems to be spun as part of the bad-boy brand, in a subtly NPOV way and needs some cleanup. I already removed the hacker and vandal phrasing; these things are true, in a sense, but presenting them in that manner the top is misleading. Probably needs to separate out the critical reception to the bottom. Condense the works substantially. --Theredproject (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
