Talk:Intellectual courage

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 18 September 2019 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Philosophy B‑class Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Doxastic logic

Why interlocking intellectual virtues and intellectual courage with doxastic logic? The whole Baehr book doesn't mention doxastic logic once.

I don't think that intellectual virtues should be seen as "stemming from a person's doxastic logic". I am not even sure this sentence makes sense, maybe the right way to put it is on the lines of "doxastic structure", following Zagzebski's monograph? In any case, I think the link to doxastic logic is misleading and - more specifically - there is no support coming from the chapter in The Inquiring Mind. Blindflotnr (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]