Talk:ICD-11

Narrative citations

Below is a list of all the "[author] ([year])" narrative citations currently used in this article. Also included are the "[author]" cites, without the "([year])", which are re-citations of a previous "[author] ([year])" cite. These are nr 10, 12, and 13.

Pending the outcome of this RfC, these inline citations may need to be changed.

Personality disorder

1. Many categories overlapped, and individuals with severe disorders often met the requirements for multiple PDs, which Reed et al. (2019) described as "artificial comorbidity".
2. Reed (2018) wrote: "Some research suggests that borderline PD is not an independently valid category, but rather a heterogeneous marker for PD severity.["]

Gaming disorder

3. Aarseth et al. (2017) stated that the evidence base which this decision relied upon is of low quality (...).
4. Rooij et al. (2017) questioned if what was called "gaming disorder" is in fact a coping strategy for underlying problems, such as depression, social anxiety, or ADHD.
5. Bean et al. (2017) wrote that the GD category caters to false stereotypes of gamers as physically unfit and socially awkward (...).
6. In support of the GD category, Lee et al. (2017) agreed that there were major limitations of the existing research (...).
7. Saunders et al. (2017) argued that gaming addiction should be in the ICD-11 just as much as gambling addiction and substance addiction (...).
8. Király and Demetrovics (2017) did not believe that a GD category would lock research into a confirmatory approach, noting that the ICD is regularly revised and characterized by permanent change.
9. Rumpf et al. (2018) noted that stigmatization is a risk not specific to GD alone.
10. Rumpf et al. also warned that (...).

Compulsive sexual behaviour disorder

11. Kraus et al. (2018) noted that several people self-identify as "sex addicts" (...).
12. Experiencing shame and guilt about sex is not a reliable indicator of a sex disorder, Kraus et al. stated.
13. Kraus et al. wrote that, for the ICD-11 (...).

Traditional medicine

14. Morris, Gomes, & Allen (2012) also used the term "International Classification of Traditional Medicine-China, Japan, Korea" (ICTM-CJK).
15. Also, Choi (2020) have used the term "ICD-11-26" to refer to the TM-chapter.
16. Morris, Gomes, & Allen (2012) have stated that Module II will cover ayurveda, that Module III will cover homeopathy, and that Module IV will cover "other TM systems with independent diagnostic conditions in a similar fashion".
17. However, these modules have yet to be made public, and Singh & Rastogi (2018) noted that this "keeps the speculations open for what actually is encompassing under the current domain [of the ICTM]".

NB: 14 and 15 are located inside footnote C. Update (30-4-25): 14–17 are no longer in the article.

- Manifestation (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

I have converted all narrative citations in the article. The RfC that I filed about this showed a consensus *against* using "Author (year)" in-text citing.

See here: Wikipedia talk:Citing sources#RFC on "Author (year)" in-text citing

Furthermore, I have italicized all instances of "et al.". I saw this at Monty Hall problem. I liked it, so I also used it here. Cheers, Manifestation (talk) 16:07, 30 April 2025 (UTC)