Talk:Hydrogen strategy

Not a neutral point of view

This entire document describes the topic solely from the point of view of advocacy organizations over represented among the sources. The points of view opposing a "hydrogen strategy" are not represented. The section "Economic impact and future outlook" is especially skewed. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:19, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The source

Cheng, W., & Lee, S. (2022). How green are the national hydrogen strategies?. Sustainability, 14(3), 1930.

contradicts the claims in "Comparison of national strategies"

We find that most national strategies are of the type “scale first and clean later”, with one or more regulatory measures in place. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:44, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 02:15, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Detailed enumeration of individual national plans is not encyclopedic.

In my option the specific details in the hydrogen strategies of individual governments is not encyclopedic knowledge. Summarizing the concept of "hydrogen strategy" does not require exhaustive enumeration by nationality. The breadth of nations with plans, the ones that do not have them, and particularly notable plans could be briefly noted without undue content about each plan. These plans are ultimately just speculation, not knowledge and thus they do not need to be summarized here. Johnjbarton (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this content along with a bunch of stuff with fake sources. Johnjbarton (talk) 01:09, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]