Talk:High-speed rail in China

Trains: By country series / Passenger trains Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the By country series task force.
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

This article lacks references.

China: Transportation Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Transportation in China task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Update on future design prototypes

It appears in just this past week alone, there are two big news reportedly of even faster train designs in the works including a 1000 km/hr "electromagnetic sledge". "Chinese scientists are testing a much faster system that reportedly can zoom at over 80% of the speed of sound" or 1030 kilometers an hour (640 miles). [1][2] As well as having being the first country to have successfully tested a hyperloop-like train system and are planning to build trains traveling through a vacuum that can travel 1,000 Km/hr. [3] [4] Such info is not currently in the article because it's very recent news, but could be worthy to add in later. Dragonkingluv23 (talk) 11:25, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lbw119, BartonRei (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lbw119 (talk) 03:26, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda

This whole article reads like a propaganda piece written by the PRC and its sympathizers. Stick to the facts and exclude all of these supposed economic benefits that only cite the South China Morning Post and other PRC mouthpieces. Find a neutral source or take it out. Also, as you can see in China now, local governments are enormously debt-laden, thanks to egregiously expensive projects like this one that China does to inflate its GDP and say it has the biggest X in the world, while not actually providing much benefit. Oh, and all of the technology was ripped off from European and American firms due to the highway robbery of Chinese “joint ventures”. Maybe that should be included as well? Now that American and European lawmakers are forcing Chinese companies (EV makers, etc) to submit to joint ventures as well, we’ll see how China likes it. 68.123.11.107 (talk) 07:45, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

Reassess article to C-class. The B-class criteria (#1): The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.

Multiple unsourced statement tags are indicative of challenges which is more than just "likely".

The article is in the following categories:

Articles with unsourced statements from February 2013
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2015
Articles with dead external links from June 2016
Articles with dead external links from April 2017
Articles with dead external links from September 2017
Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2023
Articles with unsourced statements from September 2023 -- Otr500 (talk) 06:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"High-speed railway technology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect High-speed railway technology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 17 § High-speed railway technology until a consensus is reached. Thepharoah17 (talk) 23:17, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]