Talk:HQ-9

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Untitled

Is HQ-9 another high quality copy of foreign military equipmen(e.g. S-300)?93.223.34.22 (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061207041746/http://www.sinodefence.com:80/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/army/surfacetoairmissile/hq9.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:57, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

Sorry Wikipedians,I've made a mistake and I don't know how to deal with it. 王俊玮 (talk) 09:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

I'm not sure, but I don't think HQ-19, HQ-26, HQ-29 are variants of HQ-9. If they aren't, they should probably get individual articles.2A00:EE2:6203:1200:8CD8:1C94:6992:85ED (talk) 12:42, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on HQ-9. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-course guidance

Where do these missiles get mid-course guidance from? AEW aircraft? Aircraft from carriers? Satellites? All of the above? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.231.63 (talk) 05:04, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a naval variant of the HQ-9B?

Is there a naval variant of the HQ-9B? And if so, what's it called? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.65.92 (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warhead mass

"The warhead mass is 180 kg" This doesn't make an awful lot of sense. Chaptagai (talk) 17:28, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 India–Pakistan crisis

In May 2025, during heightened military tensions between India and Pakistan, the Indian Armed Forces launched Operation Sindoor, a series of precision strikes targeting terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Following the operation, Pakistan reportedly attempted retaliatory drone and missile strikes against Indian military installations, all of which were intercepted by India's air defense systems, including the S-400. In response, India conducted further strikes on Pakistani military assets, including the destruction of a Chinese-made HQ-9 air defense system deployed near Lahore. According to multiple Indian news sources and official statements, the strike rendered Pakistan's missile shield in that region inoperative. The incident raised broader strategic questions about the effectiveness of Chinese military exports and drew international attention to the evolving capabilities of India's missile and air defense systems.[1][2][3][4] Vmp1991 (talk) 20:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]