Talk:Graham Oppy
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
He moderated a debate between William Lane Craig vs. Lawrence Krauss
[edit]He moderated a famous debate between WLC and Lawrence Krauss that can be found here (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xcgjtps5ks) held by the City Bible Forum 134.148.65.72 (talk) 10:02, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- It's notable because it's had more than 143,000 views already, and how the world has come to know thus Graham Oppy 134.148.65.72 (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
@Revirvlkodlaku I'm cleaning up after a very sneaky vandal who added absurd amounts of categories to wikipedia articles related to philosophy over the past seven years. please re-remove those categories, there are far too many of them. I reverted to a previous version because there were apparently no constructive edits since the categories were added, if you disagree please feel free to retain any other material, but please remove the categories. thank you. Psychastes (talk) 03:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Psychastes, I can point out the constructive edits, if you'd like, so let's not do another wholesale revert. Which categories do you find superfluous? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- all of the ones i removed? It really is "most of them" that are the problem, it's not really worth it to outline the whole category policy in detail but if you read WP:OC you should get a sense of the problem if you're curious. but also it should be pretty simple to just copy back the categories from my most recent edit and replace them at the bottom of this page. Psychastes (talk) 04:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Psychastes, I've kept a few extra ones, but it's essentially down to the ones you retained in your edit. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- perfect! i've just checked, it all looks good to me. thanks! Psychastes (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Psychastes, I've kept a few extra ones, but it's essentially down to the ones you retained in your edit. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- all of the ones i removed? It really is "most of them" that are the problem, it's not really worth it to outline the whole category policy in detail but if you read WP:OC you should get a sense of the problem if you're curious. but also it should be pretty simple to just copy back the categories from my most recent edit and replace them at the bottom of this page. Psychastes (talk) 04:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- C-Class philosophy of religion articles
- Low-importance philosophy of religion articles
- Philosophy of religion task force articles
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Education in Australia articles
- Low-importance Education in Australia articles
- WikiProject Education in Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles